Here are results of my short-term TIPS experiment

Did it work out well? Yes. But is it worth the risks?

By David Enna, Tipswatch.com

For a few years now, I’ve been getting questions about seemingly lavish high real yields on Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities that are nearing maturity. My usual response is that these real yields — while technically accurate — get exaggerated as maturity nears and only one coupon payment remains.

See this from Sept. 2, 2022: “What’s up with those crazy real yields on ultra-short-term TIPS?

For example, in late August 2023 readers spotted this TIPS, CUSIP 912828B25, maturing Jan 15 2024, just 4 1/2 months later.

Its quoted real yield was 4.080%, and at the time U.S. inflation was running at 3.7%, so some readers extrapolated a gorgeous return of 7.7% on this TIPS, in just 4 1/2 months. At the time, a 17-week T-bill was yielding about 5.5%.

But that isn’t the way it works. Only 4 1/2 months of inflation accruals remained so the end result for the TIPS was highly likely to be somewhere close to the 17-week T-bill, I figured. Time for an experiment! My thinking: I could get a better understanding of these short-term TIPS by investing in one.

My mind game resulted in this Sept. 3, 2023, article: “Experiment: Let’s try out a very short-term TIPS“.

The investment

To test the theory, on Aug. 30, 2023, I purchased $12,000 par of CUSIP 912828B25 on the secondary market at a real yield of 4.07% and a price of 98.73437. Because this TIPS had a high inflation index of 1.30749, the investment cost me $15,491.30 after the price discount, plus $12.52 in accrued interest.

Because this purchase was starting out with principal of $15,689.88, I was getting an immediate gain of 1.28%, plus I knew I would get 0.3125% interest at final maturity, for a total of 1.59%, which translates to an annual return of about 4.2% before any inflation accruals.

And there was the key to this whole investment: How much non-seasonally adjusted inflation (or very possibly, deflation) would we see before the January 15, 2024, maturity? Inflation accruals for TIPS are set by non-seasonally adjusted inflation two months earlier. So I already knew one month of accruals, for September:

  • September: accruals of 0.19%, based on July inflation.
  • October: ???, ended up being 0.44% based on August inflation
  • November: ???, ended up being 0.25% based on September inflation
  • December: ???, ended up being -0.04% based on October deflation
  • January: ???, ended up being -0.10% based on half of November deflation

In this case, the first three months added 0.88% to my principal and things were looking good. But the next 1 1/2 months subtracted 0.14% from my principal. I expected this to happen, because non-seasonally adjusted inflation often goes negative in November and December.

Verdict: This time, it worked.

My goal was to use this investment maturing Jan. 15, 2024, to help fund my next TIPS purchase … the new 10-year TIPS that was auctioned last week with a real yield of 1.81%. Would I end up doing better buying this TIPS, or just investing in the 17-week Treasury that would mature on Jan. 2, 2024?

Here is the result:

I adjusted the investment totals to come up with a similar ending number around $15,850. The TIPS ended up being the winner in this contest, with a nominal annualized yield of 6.21% versus 5.52% for the 17-week T-bill. That’s 69-basis-point bonus, but in actual dollars it amounts to about $75, or about one-third the cost of one trip to Costco.

This TIPS had an ending inflation index of 1.31741, 0.759% higher than the starting index of 1.30749. That is annualized inflation of about 2.02%. And remember, I figured with the final coupon payment the annualized nominal yield would be 4.2% before inflation or deflation. The actual return was 6.21%. Do the math: 4.2% + 2.02% = 6.22%, so you can see roughly how the real yield actually topped 4.0%, as advertised.

Final point: Is it worth it?

Any time you buy a TIPS with just a few months to maturity, you will be highly likely to be buying a large amount of additional principal that is not guaranteed to be returned at maturity. In this case, I was buying 30.7% extra principal at a cost of about $3,504. If deflation had struck in August and September, I would have gotten a lousy return versus the 17-week T-bill.

Deflation is more of a risk in the short-term (especially nearing the end the year) than the long term. In the future, I would be a lot more likely to buy the 17-week T-bill, which involves zero risk and a certain return at maturity.

Confused by TIPS? Read my Q&A on TIPS

TIPS in depth: Understand the language

TIPS on the secondary market: Things to consider

Upcoming schedule of TIPS auctions

* * *

Feel free to post comments or questions below. If it is your first-ever comment, it will have to wait for moderation. After that, your comments will automatically appear.Please stay on topic and avoid political tirades.

David Enna is a financial journalist, not a financial adviser. He is not selling or profiting from any investment discussed. I Bonds and TIPS are not “get rich” investments; they are best used for capital preservation and inflation protection. They can be purchased through the Treasury or other providers without fees, commissions or carrying charges. Please do your own research before investing.

About Tipswatch

Author of Tipswatch.com blog, David Enna is a long-time journalist based in Charlotte, N.C. A past winner of two Society of American Business Editors and Writers awards, he has written on real estate and home finance, and was a founding editor of The Charlotte Observer's website.
This entry was posted in Cash alternatives, Inflation, Investing in TIPS, Treasury Bills, TreasuryDirect. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Here are results of my short-term TIPS experiment

  1. Pingback: A 10-year TIPS matured Jan. 15. How did it do as an investment? | Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities

  2. DRM says:

    I purchased the same TIPS 2 different times. In early November, and again in early December (yeah really short term). Mine was an experiment too. I ended up with both amounting to 4.99% for the time I had them. One was better than that and one worse. The last two months really hurt. I would have been better off in a money market. But I wanted to see how it would go. Got a small taste of deflation and how the accrued inflation can go backwards on TIPS in the secondary market. As learning goes the .5% versus a Tbill was cheap education and experience. It is different when you live it vs thinking about it of course.

    Love your articles here btw. Reading it before purchasing my first TIPS made everything clear, and gave me the confidence to give it a go short term. Plus I have a more thorough understanding for buying longer term TIPS.

    Thanks.

  3. David Renaud says:

    I wonder if this could be a viable strategy. The market priced in the unknown so you picked up a risk premium. If you didn’t get the premium it would have made sense to just buy the 17-week. This trade worked out and I am sure there will be times that it doesn’t. If you placed the ‘bet’ over and over would it tend to outperform the 17 week? Is there a way to back test this? Keep up the great work!

  4. You spend too much at Costco.

    • Don says:

      Once a month my dogs gotta eat.

    • Tipswatch says:

      Yes, this is true. Especially when you have a basement freezer. However, I cook almost all our meals and we rarely eat out. One restaurant dinner at a nice place can cost $100+ for a couple. Costco prices are good, but our Costco bill has doubled over the last 6 to 7 years. (We go once every other week.)

  5. DW says:

    So the breakeven point on that particular TIPS was about 1.4% annualized (5.5-4.07), which seems attractive, at first glance, despite the trend of decelerating CPI-U inflation.

  6. Roy says:

    Your enthusiasm and curiosity in this special area of finance are remarkable, but your ability to communicate the results so clearly are the standard I wish all web posters would achieve–Thanks!

  7. Len says:

    A job well done. Generally if it looks too good to be true, it usually is. The markets are very ‘ efficient ‘ .

    • Buffethead says:

      Thanks for the experiment, but I think it would also be valid to include comparison to the returns from a good money market account, which would be just a few dollars less than a 17 week T-Bill. For example, VMFXX is currently at 5.28% 7 day yield and 5.41% compound yield and the return is taxed at 58% of your state tax rate. Zero effort, built-in compounding and immediate access if needed.

  8. Don Parker says:

    Is it a reasonable interpretation to say that the short term TIPS is a better option when the time interval does not include the months of November and December?

    • Tipswatch says:

      Possibly, but the market is pricing the TIPS to adjust for those months of likely low inflation or deflation. So at the least it is a factor for the investor to be aware of.

Leave a comment